appsapkandroid Search

Side-by-side comparison

Qtek 8600 vs Qtek A9100

Qtek 8600 — quick specs

  • Network
    GSM
  • Display
    2.2 inches · 240×320
  • Camera
    1.3 MP
  • Memory
  • Battery
    1190 mAh
  • OS
    Microsoft Windows Mobile 5.0 Smartphone

Qtek A9100 — quick specs

  • Network
    GSM
  • Display
    2.8 inches · 240×320
  • Camera
    1.3 MP
  • Memory
  • Battery
    1250 mAh
  • OS
    Microsoft Windows Mobile 5.0 PocketPC

Full specification comparison

NETWORK
Technology
AGSM / UMTS
BGSM
2G bands
AGSM 900 / 1800 / 1900
BGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands
AUMTS 2100
B
Speed
AYes, 384 kbps
B
LAUNCH
Announced
A2006, June
B2006, March
Status
ADiscontinued
BDiscontinued
BODY
Dimensions
A112.4 x 46 x 14.8 mm (4.43 x 1.81 x 0.58 in)
B108 x 58 x 23.7 mm (4.25 x 2.28 x 0.93 in)
Weight
A120 g (4.23 oz)
B168 g (5.93 oz)
SIM
AMini-SIM
BMini-SIM
DISPLAY
Type
ATFT, 65K colors
BTFT resistive touchscreen, 65K colors
Size
A2.2 inches, 34 x 45 mm, 15.0 cm2 (~29.0% screen-to-body ratio)
B2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~38.8% screen-to-body ratio)
Resolution
A240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~182 ppi density)
B240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density)
PLATFORM
OS
AMicrosoft Windows Mobile 5.0 Smartphone
BMicrosoft Windows Mobile 5.0 PocketPC
CPU
ASamsung 2442 300 MHz
B200 MHz ARM926EJ-S
Chipset
A
BTI OMAP 850
MEMORY
Card slot
AmicroSD (dedicated slot)
BminiSD
Internal
A64MB RAM, 128MB ROM
B64MB RAM, 128MB ROM
MAIN CAMERA
Video
AYes
BNo
Single
A1.3 MP
B1.3 MP
Features
A
BLED flash
SELFIE CAMERA
Single
AYes
BNo
SOUND
Loudspeaker
AYes
BYes
3.5mm jack
ANo
BNo
COMMS
WLAN
ANo
BWi-Fi 802.11 b/i
Bluetooth
AYes
B1.2
GPS
ANo
BNo
USB
AProprietary
BminiUSB
Radio
ANo
BNo
Infrared port
AYes
BYes
BATTERY
Battery Type
ARemovable Li-Po 1190 mAh battery
BRemovable Li-Po 1250 mAh battery
MISC
Colors
A
BGray

Cells highlighted in green indicate a measurably better spec on that phone (battery capacity, RAM, storage, display size). Text-only specs are shown side by side without highlighting.

Full Qtek 8600 review →Full Qtek A9100 review →