appsapkandroid Search

Side-by-side comparison

Google Pixel 8 vs Xiaomi Redmi K40

Google Pixel 8 — quick specs

  • Network
  • Display
  • Camera
  • Memory
  • Battery
    Non-removable Li-Po
  • OS
    Android 14

Xiaomi Redmi K40 — quick specs

  • Network
    5G / LTE
  • Display
  • Camera
  • Memory
    256 GB
  • Battery
    Non-removable Li-Po
  • OS

Full specification comparison

NETWORK
Technology
A
B2G, 3G, 4G, 4G LTE, 5G
LAUNCH
Status
AAvailable. Released 2023
BAvailable. Released 2021
Announced
A
BK40/Pro/Pro+: / Poco F3: / Mi 11i: / Mi 11X/Pro: / K40 Gaming: / Poco F3 GT: / K40S: / Poco F4:
BODY
SIM
ANano SIM and eSIM
B
Build
ASlate
BSlate
PLATFORM
OS
AAndroid 14 / Upgradable to Android 16
B
Chipset
AGoogle Tensor G3
B
CPU
A
BOcta-core
MEMORY
Card slot
ANo
BNone
Internal
A
B128 or 256GB UFS 3.1
SOUND
Loudspeaker
AYes, with stereo speakers
BStereo loudspeakers
3.5mm jack
ANo
BNo
COMMS
WLAN
AWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax, dual-band
BWi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n/6/6e (2.4 & 5GHz), dual-band, WiFi Direct, DLNA, hotspot Bluetooth V5.1/5.2, A2DP, Low-energy, aptX-HD, NFC, USB 2.0 Type-C, Infrared Blaster, GNSS (A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NAVIC)
Bluetooth
A5.x
B5.x, A2DP, LE
GPS
AYes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
BYes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
USB
AUSB Type-C
BUSB Type-C
NFC
AYes
BYes
FEATURES
Sensors
AFingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
BFingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
BATTERY
Charging
AFast charging
BFast charging
Battery Type
ANon-removable Li-Po
BNon-removable Li-Po
DISPLAY
Type
A
B6.67 in AMOLED capacitive touchscreen, 1080p 1080 × 2400 pixels (2.5 MP), 20:9 aspect ratio (395ppi), 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+
SELFIE CAMERA
Single
A
B20 MP, (f/2.2, 27mm, 1/3.4", 0.8 μm) / HDR, 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps

Cells highlighted in green indicate a measurably better spec on that phone (battery capacity, RAM, storage, display size). Text-only specs are shown side by side without highlighting.

Full Google Pixel 8 review →Full Xiaomi Redmi K40 review →